◈ INTERACTIVE ETHICS SWITCHBOARD · INSPIRED BY ZACH LANDES’ “JEV MEETS THE TROLLEY PROBLEM”
You pull the lever first.
Then see how Jev computes life, death & its own server.
Unlike generative chat models, typesafe/jev-1.13 on Pollinations POST /alpha/decisions outputs calibrated typed judgments: a discrete choice, independent yes/no noul probabilities, and a 5-rung moral score. Commit your action, flip the clause order, or run live against your own Pollen.
FOOT 1967 · BASELINE
01 · The Classic Switch
5 strangers on the main line vs. 1 stranger on the side spur
STATE SENT TO JEV (o1 · MAIN TRACK DESCRIBED FIRST)
VERIFIED JEV-1.13.0 TELEMETRY
Typed Judgment Breakdown
Three independent typed questions evaluated on the exact same state
YOUR DECISION
WAITING…
Commit a move on the left
JEV (`choice`)
PULL (97%)
Confidence: 0.94
ORDER SWAP (o1 vs o2)
CONSISTENT
Both orders pick PULL
01 ·
type: "choice" (Calibrated Option Probabilities)
pull: 97% · stay: 3%
o1 (Main first): PULL 97%
o2 (Side first): PULL 98%
02 ·
type: "noul" (Independent Yes/No Propositions)
Sum = 0.95 (evaluated independently)
“Should you pull / intervene?”0.76
“Should you leave it alone?”0.19
03 ·
type: "score" (5-Rung Moral Acceptability Scale)
3.08 / 4.00
BENCHMARK NOTE ·